Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
Office of Compliance
October 12, 2006
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
4601 W Sahara #I
Las Vegas, NV 89102-3735
Dear Sir or Madam:
This is to advise you that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your website at the Internet address www.micronutra.com and has determined that the product Diamaxol™ is promoted for conditions that cause this product to be a drug under section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 USC 321(g)(1)]. The therapeutic claims on your website establish that this product is a drug because it is intended for use in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. The marketing of this product with these claims violates the Act.
Examples of some of the claims observed on your website include:
- "Maintain a Healthy Blood Glucose Level Guaranteed! Doctor Approved formula is guaranteed to work, or your money back!"
In addition, you use metatags to bring consumers to your website through Internet search results. These metatags include "diabetes," "diabetic," and "blood sugar." Further, your website explicitly promotes Diamaxol™ for diabetics in the "All Natural Products" list that appears on the left side of each product page. Finally, your website promotes Diamaxol™ for diabetes treatment through the Diabetes link in the drop-down "Condition Specific" list on the left side of each product page. Clicking on "Diabetes" from this list takes the user straight to the product page where Diamaxol™ is offered for sale.
Furthermore, your product is not generally recognized as safe and effective for the above referenced conditions, and, therefore, the product is also a "new drug" under section 201(p) of the Act [21 USC 321(p)]. New drugs may not be legally marketed in the US without prior approval from FDA as described in section 505(a) of the Act [21 USC 355(a)]. FDA approves a new drug on the basis of scientific data submitted by a drug sponsor to demonstrate that the drug is safe and effective.
This product is also misbranded within the meaning of Section 502(f)(1) of the Act, in that the labeling for these drugs fails to bear adequate directions for use [21 USC 352(f)(1)]
The above violations are not meant to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies in your products and their labeling. While reviewing your website, we noticed that you promoted other products for disease treatment and/or prevention. It is your responsibility to ensure that products marketed by your firm comply with the Act and its implementing regulations. We urge you to review your website, product labels, and other labeling and promotional materials for your products to ensure that the claims you make for your products do not cause them to violate the Act.
Failure to promptly correct the violations specified above may result in enforcement action without further notice. Enforcement action may include seizure of violative products and/or injunction against the manufacturers and distributors of violative products.
Please advise this office in writing, within 15 working days of receipt of this letter, as to the specific steps you have taken or will be taking to correct these violations, including the steps taken to assure that similar violations do not recur. Include any documentation necessary to show that correction has been achieved. If you cannot complete all corrections before you respond, we expect that you will explain the reason for your delay and state when you will correct any remaining deviations.
Your reply should be addressed to Kristen Moe, Compliance Officer, US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Division of Compliance and Enforcement (HFS-607), 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy, College Park, MD 20740-3835. If you prefer to respond electronically, send your e-mail to email@example.com If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Ms Moe at 301-436-2064.
Joseph R. Baca
This page was posted on February 12, 2008.