"The Enforma System" Infomercial Producers Settle FTC Charges

FTC Alleged the Defendants Were Instrumental in Developing Deceptive Enforma Ads

FTC News Release
March 1, 2005

California infomercial producer Modern Interactive Technology, Inc. (MIT), and its two principals, Mark Levine and David Richmond, have agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they had an active role in developing the deceptive claims made to sell "The Enforma System" weight-loss products. The settlement requires, among other things, that the defendants have competent and reliable scientific evidence to substantiate future claims for any dietary supplement, food, drug, or device.

This is the last case growing out of the sales of the Enforma System, a weight-loss product consisting of two dietary supplements &mdash "Fat Trapper" and "Exercise In A Bottle." In April 2000, the FTC announced that it had settled charges against Enforma Natural Products, Inc., the vendor of the Enforma System. The order in that case required Enforma Natural Products and its principal Andrew Grey to pay $10 million in consumer redress. Thereafter, in August 2000, the FTC filed a complaint in federal district court against MIT and its officers, alleging that they played an active role in writing, editing, and producing the infomercials for the Enforma System. In September 2001, however, the district court issued an order ruling that the Commission's settlement order with Enforma Natural Products was "res judicata" as to MIT, Levine, and Richmond, meaning that the Commission had no right to bring a separate action against them. The Commission appealed this ruling to the Ninth Circuit Court, and in September 2004, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's res judicata decision. It held that Enforma Natural Products was not sufficiently connected to MIT, Levine, and Richmond to justify barring the FTC's claims against them, and remanded the matter to the district court for litigation. The settlement announced today resolves the charges against MIT, Levine, and Richmond without the need for further court proceedings.

The settlement order:

The order does not require the defendants to pay consumer redress but contains an avalanche clause for $2 million, the amount the defendants were paid for producing the Enforma infomercials, which will be triggered if they have misrepresented their current financial condition.

The stipulated final order for permanent injunction was entered by the US District Court for the Central District of California, on February 17, 2005.

Related Documents

This page was posted on September 6, 2005.

Links to Recommended Companies

  • PharmacyChecker.com: Compare drug prices and save money at verified online pharmacies.
  • ConsumerLab.com: Evaluates the quality of dietary supplement and herbal products.
  • Amazon.com: Discount prices, huge inventory, and superb customer service.
  • OnlyMyEmail: Award-winning anti-spam services.
  • 10 Types: Website design, development, and hosting with superb technical support.